Death of a Blog
filed in Blogging on May.13, 2010
I was quite surprised when, as a rookie, I realized that one of the most difficult aspects of being a teacher was having to be a fake.
Students learn best when they can relate to a teacher, yet schools require us to be obscure mysteries. Schools want you to inspire from a distance. Only your “teacher self” can show; everything else must be tucked away.
Think back on the teachers that influenced you as a teenager. Maybe 50% affected you because of their intelligence. They seemed to know cool facts, and they could explain them in ways that made you want to know more. The other half of your memorable teachers seemed to understand something about life, and by sharing with you a tiny slice of theirs, they granted you a hint of what the world could offer. I’m not talking about teachers who kicked back and told stories about partying in 1968, or who did creepy things like offer to take you for a ride in their van. I’m talking about the teacher I remember who told me I might like the author Herman Hesse, or the one who played Eek-a-Mouse in class and introduced me to reggae music. I’m thinking of Dan Terry and Gerda Bosch, teachers who recognized that I was struggling with the weight of adolescence and called me to their offices simply to talk.
Then you become a teacher and confront attitudes like this:
Educators have a professional image and reputation to uphold. They represent not only themselves but the employing school district. Educators must keep this fact in mind, even when they are off the clock and engaged in personal activities. Educators seem to understand this when they are at the grocery store. They expect to see a parent or student, are dressed appropriately, conduct themselves appropriately and rarely are educators seen behaving inappropriately or immorally. Good judgment typically prevails.
Sure, good judgment should prevail, but teachers have a right to a life outside of school. And yes, I understand that every job has standards, and that an accountant can also get fired for an inappropriate Facebook comment. But I didn’t sign a contract to be some kind of moral beacon for my students. I want to show them how to read and write well, and maybe let them recognize that I’m a moderately upstanding citizen who also happens to love books and teaching.
Instead I get notice that, after much discussion, the Columbia School District is inching its way toward a formal staff and student relations policy dealing with technology. As currently proposed, it contains seventeen problem areas such as the following:
- Knowingly allow students access to the staff member’s personal social networking website or webpage that discusses or portrays sex, nudity, alcohol or drug use or other behaviors associated with the staff member’s private life that would be inappropriate to discuss with a student at school.
- Knowingly grant students access to any portion of the member’s personal social networking website or webpage that is not accessible to the general public.
- Post information about identifiable students on a personal website or webpage on a social networking site.
So what do I do? I have had this web site for years, and I rarely if ever have a student discover it. I limit my posts to ideas that wouldn’t embarrass me if they made their way to the front page of the Columbia Tribune. I hide politics, and religion, and my worst thoughts about teaching, and anything that might cause the people up above any discomfort. I don’t accept students as friends on Facebook. I don’t use text messaging with students. But that doesn’t appear to be good enough. Looking back over my blog, I notice that my April 6, 2010, post mentions that I went to a bar while in Florida for my 40th birthday. My November 5, 2008, post mentions that I saw the election of Barack Obama as a momentous symbolic day in America’s long struggle with the lingering effects of slavery. My May 5, 2008, post uses the word “hillbilly” when discussing a visit to friends in Viburnum. And my December 30, 2009, post lists my favorite CDs of 2009—some with words that might offend a parent if a student happened upon my web page and possibly decided to care about my musical taste enough to download a song.
So I’ll kill my blog, cash my paycheck, and drive another small nail into the remnants of my sixteen-year-old self.
Comments Off

I have a problem with feeling proud of my video game accomplishments. I mean, unless you’re making money playing on the South Korean Starcraft circuit, how much credit can you take for getting to the end of Assassin’s Creed II or Grand Theft Auto IV? There is, of course, skill involved, but there are also many, many, many long hours of “practice,” and the guilt-ridden part of me constantly challenges with questions like, “Wouldn’t you be better off reading War and Peace?”
All that marketers wish to accomplish is a little brand loyalty. Get you hooked when you’re young, make you believe that their product is part of your personality, then milk the good vibrations for 50 years worth of purchases. I’d like to believe I’m a bit more logical than that. I’m loyal to brands, but it has more to do with experience. After all, if you’re replacing a Honda with fifteen years and 150,000 miles on it, why would you switch to a Toyota?
I really want to write about how truly odd it is that somebody, somewhere, is really excited about purchasing 27 DVDs of Miami Vice—every single episode!—and is only waiting for the price to drop to a reasonable level. Somebody, somewhere received the same daily sales e-mail from Buy.com that I did and then excitedly, frantically logged in to purchase it while it was still available. A truly strange world we live in.
So I went to see my first concert in quite a while last night, an especially rare occasion because it was a school night, and an even more obscure event because it was a Monday night (which means you can’t fall back on the “All I have to do is make it through Friday” justification). It was Deer Tick at Mojo’s, and it ROCKED.